![]() ![]() The biggest difference between the first 2 games is that in the first game it's more about being stealthy, working your buttocks off to finally do the objective and maybe get a tank and blast the ♥♥♥♥ out of everyone after the hard work, and the 2nd is better if you prefer having more choice in how to complete the mission. So I guess it's also got the best replay value, and it has the best multiplayer of the series by far.Įither way both are better than Commandos 3, which had a lot of flaws. Personally I only play Commandos 2 with the Destination Paris mod these days. But for someone new I guess it will be easier to get into. Couldn't complete that ♥♥♥♥ without watching a guide.Ĭommandos 2 is kinda dumbed down in that you can escape if an enemy spots you, and you are free to use louder weapons much more often without hassle. Commandos 2:destination paris is an amazing mod for C2:Men of Courage. The expansion Strike in narrow path was like 50x harder. As a commandos lover i cannot help but share this mod with the community. I don't know why people find it so hard, it really isn't in my opinion. ![]() ![]() As someone who has played the whole series since around 2000 maybe, go for Commandos Behind Enemy Lines if you like playing stealthy more, the only missions that I found hard though were 14 and 15, the rest wasn't that hard if you ask me, even the final mission felt a lot easier than those. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |